All Nature Portfolio journals, including Communications Biology, offer a double anonymized peer review option. Authors may choose this option at submission to remain anonymous to referees prior to ...

For any general questions and comments about the peer-review process, the journal or its editorial policies that are not addressed here, we encourage reviewers to contact us using the feedback ...

JCO Journals employ a single-anonymized review process. Reviewers know the identity of the authors ... The Editor-in-Chief must approve all accept and reject decisions, except when away or recused ...

The process of assessing manuscripts is crucial in making sure that the scientific record is accurate, trustworthy and of high quality. It’s an integral part of getting great science into the world.

The following outline can be used to track the status of your manuscript. If you currently have a manuscript in peer review, you will see a status message on your Author Dashboard in ScholarOne under ...

Why does inclusion and diversity in peer review matter? A peer review process that is inclusive can promote quality and fairness. If we encourage debate and discussion from a diverse range of voices, ...

but how will this affect researchers as future applications of AI-powered algorithms impact each stage of the review and publishing process? Join Sonja Krane of ACS Publications and Osvaldo Oliviera ...