Judge Steven Hippler did not render any decisions, but two days of hearings revealed new information in the Idaho student ...

A transcript from Bryan Kohberger's closed-door hearing on investigative genetic genealogy evidence held last week will be ...

Languages: English. Anne Taylor, an attorney representing Bryan Kohberger, told the judge she did not have any cases to support her argument that admitting DNA evidence would violate her client's ...

Prosecutors in the Bryan Kohberger case on Tuesday asked the court to appoint a new special assistant attorney general. Kohberger, 30, is charged with four counts of first-degree murder and one ...

BOISE, Idaho — Attorneys for the Poconos man charged with murder in connection with the killings of four University of Idaho students are asking a judge to throw out most of the evidence in the case ...

An attorney representing Bryan Kohberger, who is accused of killing four University Idaho students during a home invasion, questioned the credibility of one of two surviving roommates in court on ...

Attorneys for Bryan Kohberger, the suspect in the case of the four murdered college students in Idaho, are fighting to have critical evidence in the case tossed out before it goes to trial. NBC Camila ...

Bryan Kohberger's attorneys were back in court, fighting to get key evidence tossed out ahead of his murder trial scheduled for this summer.

As Idaho student murders suspect Bryan Kohberger's trial approaches, his defense is drawing comparisons to another high-profile case that rocked the state.

Bryan Kohberger avoided a return to court this week as he sat in jail while his attorneys and prosecutors went back-and-forth over whether key evidence will be permitted in his pre-trial hearings.

The hearing is expected to go for most of the day Thursday, with some portions closed to the public. A big topic up for discussion will be the use of investigative genetic genealogy.

Idaho murders suspect Bryan Kohberger will return to court for the first time in more than two months to argue for excluding nearly all evidence collected by police.