The peer review process is central to science – but it can be easily manipulated. Improving it is vital to uphold research ...

For any general questions and comments about the peer-review process, the journal or its editorial policies that are not addressed here, we encourage reviewers to contact us using the feedback ...

except when away or recused from peer review. Authors can expect to learn of a decision on their paper approximately 4 weeks after submission, depending on the turnaround time for reviews. The ...

Inspiration for teaching comes from various sources. One of these is at the heart of the "Peer Feedback on Teaching" initiative launched by the rector and the Lecturers' Conference: mutual classroom ...

Peer review as we know it arose in the mid 20th ... A "strength-based approach" to review can be encouraged. This is where feedback about the paper's strengths as well as the gaps in the paper ...

Why does inclusion and diversity in peer review matter? A peer review process that is inclusive can promote quality and fairness. If we encourage debate and discussion from a diverse range of voices, ...

It is expected that in 2025, approximately three million articles will be indexed in Scopus and the Web of Science.

Sakana said it collaborated with researchers at the University of British Columbia and the University of Oxford to submit three AI-generated papers to the aforementioned workshop for peer review.

Several AI academics took to social media to criticize Intology and Autoscience’s stunts as a co-opting of the scientific peer review process. “All these AI scientist papers are using peer ...

One of the core features of the scientific community is the concept of “peer review” where any claims made by a scientist are open to be analyzed and reproduced by others in the community for ...