Traditional forms of peer review occur before a paper is published. Both reviewers and authors remain anonymous. Different ...
It is expected that in 2025, approximately three million articles will be indexed in Scopus and the Web of Science. If each ...
These assessments enhance collaboration skills essential in real-world settings, particularly in STEM, where peer review is a key part of the publication process. Peer assessments also increase ...
Correspondence and all forms of published correction may also ... For any general questions and comments about the peer-review process, the journal or its editorial policies that are not addressed ...
Peer review is the cornerstone of scientific publishing, ensuring that research is scrutinised by experts prior to publication, yet it can be notoriously slow. The journal, Biology Open, is taking a ...
To earn the credits, you will need to answer 4 questions at the end of the peer review form. The journal’s editor will evaluate your review and determine its eligibility to receive CME. What are the ...
On March 6, 2025, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced plans to centralize peer review of all applications for grants, ...
One of the concerns that arose from the Patrick case was a fear that no physician would want to participate in peer review if he or she could be potentially liable for a bad report. The HCQIA gave ...
Traditional forms of peer review occur before a paper is published. Both reviewers and authors remain anonymous. Different disciplines take a slightly different approach to the review process.
Suggest potential reviewers Make a decision on the paper without further review (the manuscript will move to step ... the SME will evaluate the revised manuscript and either request further peer ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results