Formal post-publication commentary on published papers can involve challenges, clarifications or, in some cases, replication of the published work and may, after peer review, be published online ...

The peer review process is central to science – but it can be easily manipulated. Improving it is vital to uphold research ...

Academics are accusing several AI startups of co-opting the peer review process at ICLR, a long-running AI conference, for ...

Sakana said it collaborated with researchers at the University of British Columbia and the University of Oxford to submit three AI-generated papers to the aforementioned workshop for peer review. The ...

Sakana said it collaborated with researchers at the University of British Columbia and the University of Oxford to submit three AI-generated papers to the aforementioned workshop for peer review.

Traditional forms of peer review occur before a paper is published. Both reviewers and authors remain anonymous. Different disciplines take a slightly different approach to the review process.

If you currently have a manuscript in peer review, you will see a status message on your Author Dashboard ... Suggest potential reviewers Make a decision on the paper without further review (the ...

“The Sage publication that accepted my bogus paper is the Journal of International Medical Research. Without asking for any changes to the paper's scientific content, the journal sent an acceptance ...

The AI startup submitted three research papers generated by its AI system for review at the ICLR 2025 workshop.

Peer review is the cornerstone of scientific publishing, ensuring that research is scrutinised by experts prior to publication, yet it can be notoriously slow. The journal, Biology Open, is taking a ...