The peer review process is central to science – but it can be easily manipulated. Improving it is vital to uphold research ...

For any general questions and comments about the peer-review process, the journal or its editorial policies that are not addressed here, we encourage reviewers to contact us using the feedback ...

There are plenty of reasons why instructors encourage peer review, but here are a few that are relevant to you as a writer. It gives you an authentic response from a reader—without judgment. It allows ...

But “taking superficial notes and having an LLM synthesize them falls far, far short of writing an adequate peer review”, counters Carl Bergstrom, an evolutionary biologist at the University ...

We recognise the important role of our peer reviewers, offering support and recognition to every member of our network. Peer review is the process of having manuscripts assessed by active researchers ...

Past and present contributors to the writing center at Hendrix College authored a piece featured in the Spring 2025 issue of The Peer Review.

Through reflective listening and by asking questions, the consultant can help you to clarify your thinking and writing at all levels, from organization and content to sentence structure and grammar.

Peer review as we know it arose in the mid 20th ... Journals can regularly review their current reviewer pool and broaden that pool by writing directly to authors of recently published papers.

This is an area of peer review that calls for additional research ... from how the reviewer expects these elements of scientific writing to be handled may in some cases skew the reviewer's ...

This week, researchers at the University of Florida found that while AI can be a valuable assistant, it falls short of ...

Since the start of the year, Wiley, Elsevier and Springer Nature have all announced the adoption of generative AI–powered tools or guidelines, including those designed to aid scientists in research, ...