The problem can be either with the reader or the writer! As a Reviewer . . . As you begin writing your peer review, remember that your peers benefit more from constructive criticism than vague praise.

After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should be sent for peer review.

How shared decision-making and discussing the impact of treatment side effects on quality of life are essential to prostate ...

The post contains 261 new customer stories, which appear at the beginning of each section of customer lists. The post will be ...

What makes the situation more alarming is the absence of compensation or transitional support for displaced workers. The ...

Wesley J. Smith is an author and a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute’s Center on Human Exceptionalism. God save the King! The victims of such a nihilistic mindset will be the elderly ...

Encompass Health Corporation ( NYSE: EHC) Q1 2025 Earnings Conference Call April 25, 2025 9:00 AM ET Mark Miller - Chief Investor Relations Officer Mark Tarr - President and Chief Executive Officer ...

Time to first decision (peer-reviewed only): 36.0 days** Time to first decision (all decisions): 8.0 days*** This journal is part of our new offering. Scientists can continue to find innovative ...

Examples include whole grains ... The authors of a 2017 review found that garlic supplements helped manage blood sugar and cholesterol levels in people with T2DM. Fish and other animal proteins ...

This brief outlines how policymakers and practitioners might help support rural-serving community colleges to successfully ...

The Week is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

April 22, 2025 • Didion's book is an intimate chronicle of the author's struggle to help her daughter, even if it meant digging into her own long-unexamined neuroses.