The problem can be either with the reader or the writer! As a Reviewer . . . As you begin writing your peer review, remember that your peers benefit more from constructive criticism than vague praise.

After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should be sent for peer review.

The former DeSisto School tract was the focus of the Stockbridge Select Board's April 17 extended session as officials gained insight into a peer review report of a multi-use development proposed on ...

Samantha Miller's path to nursing started at the kitchen table. After her father got stitches for a finger injury — and refused to go back to the doctor to have the stitches removed — Miller, then a ...

student excellence and peer assessments. The rankings analyzed in-person, hybrid and flexible master’s and Doctor of Nursing Practice programs, drawing on data submitted in fall 2024 and early ...

What makes the situation more alarming is the absence of compensation or transitional support for displaced workers. The ...

based Mercy on April 28. Ms. Clements currently serves as community chief nursing officer for Mercy’s Oklahoma hospitals and as vice president and chief nursing officer of Mercy Hospital ...

The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com intended to be a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend ...

Wesley J. Smith is an author and a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute’s Center on Human Exceptionalism. God save the King! The victims of such a nihilistic mindset will be the elderly ...