Make specific suggestions for improvement. Be tactful but be candid and direct. Don't be afraid to disagree with another reviewer. Make and receive comments in a useful way. Remember peer review is ...

After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should be sent for peer review.

where the authors found feedback from GPT-4 review to be more helpful than feedback from some peer reviewers. Additionally, he believes that AI will be good at evaluating whether an article ...

The yeast RGG motif-containing RNA binding protein Scd6 and its human ortholog LSM14A regulate the translation of specific ...

Alternatively, 74 (15%) RCTs had received at least one comment on PubPeer or preprint servers, totalling 348 comments. In 46 (9%) RCTs, the issues identified by post-preprint and post-publication peer ...

The second category of peer review is a frequently deployed teaching practice where students exchange ... that the primary purpose of peer response was to get feedback on your draft that could be ...

where the authors found feedback from GPT-4 review to be more helpful than feedback from some peer reviewers. Additionally, he believes that AI will be good at evaluating whether an article ...

Multi-modal data integration of single-nuclei RNA and ATAC sequencing with spatial transcriptomics, provides new molecular insights into gene regulatory networks driving cell state transitions in ...