The peer review process is central to science – but it can be easily manipulated. Improving it is vital to uphold research ...

Sakana, a Japan-based AI startup, has claimed that its AI system has successfully generated scientific papers that passed peer review. The development comes at a time when the debate around the rising ...

Traditional forms of peer review occur before a paper is published. Both reviewers and authors remain anonymous. Different disciplines take a slightly different approach to the review process.

Sakana said it collaborated with researchers at the University of British Columbia and the University of Oxford to submit ...

Three AI-powered steps to faster, smarter peer review One study 1 of peer-review reports for papers submitted to AI conferences in 2023 and 2024 found that between 7% and 17% of these reports ...

In 2023, an academic journal, the Annals of Operations Research, retracted an entire special isssue because the peer review process for it was compromised. The case brought into sharp focus broader ...

Although both trials are small, they are a good start at gathering data on paid peer review, says Balazs Aczel, a psychologist at Eötvös Loránd University in Budapest. But he adds that whether to pay ...

Several AI academics took to social media to criticize Intology and Autoscience’s stunts as a co-opting of the scientific peer review process. “All these AI scientist papers are using peer ...

Climate change deniers are pushing an AI-generated paper questioning human-induced warming, leading experts to warn against ...

“We’re proud to announce that a paper produced by the AI Scientist-v2 passed the peer-review process at a workshop in ICLR (International Conference on Learning Representations), a top AI ...