For this assignment, you will read and mark two of your peers’ drafts and write a letter to each peer identifying areas for revision with suggestions for revision. For two of your peers’ essay drafts, ...

For any general questions and comments about the peer-review process, the journal or its editorial policies that are not addressed here, we encourage reviewers to contact us using the feedback ...

This guide is designed to provide faculty and departments with insights on performing effective peer review of teaching. It was developed in October 2017 by members of a Faculty Learning Community: ...

"If AI models are to be used in peer review, authors have the right to be informed" writes Timothy Hugh Barker in this AI and ...

Examples include terminations of employment and non-selection for a job position. Anyone who has or has had an employment contract the WBG, including consultants and former employees, can file with ...

Nonetheless, instructors need to prepare students for peer review with adequate instruction and examples to be effective. Expand the boxes below to learn more about best practices and resources to ...

We recognise the important role of our peer reviewers, offering support and recognition to every member of our network. Peer review is the process of having manuscripts assessed by active researchers ...

Their willingness to offer their time and expertise is greatly appreciated. The Nature journals' peer-review policy and process are explained on this page. The Nature journals are appreciative of ...

Finally, peer review is most effective when paired with reflection and dialogue ... instructors should also actively monitor the process to address biases or inconsistencies. This includes reviewing a ...

Peer review is fundamental to academic publishing ... And the reviewer had provided no page or line numbers and no specific ...