Trump wrote on his social media site. Trump didn't offer any evidence to support his claims. Nor did the White House. Trump asserted in his all-caps post that the pardons are void and have no ...
By Claire Brown In a legal filing Monday, the Environmental Protection Agency did not provide direct evidence of waste, fraud, or abuse in a $20 billion climate grant program that the agency ...
Trump claimed. Trump hasn't offered any evidence to support his claims, and neither has the White House. When asked whether Trump had legal authority to void pardons signed by autopen, press ...
Donald Trump declared all pardons issued by Joe Biden invalid, claiming they were signed using an autopen without Biden's knowledge. Trump suggested those involved may have committed a crime and ...
President Trump has declared that presidential pardons issued by Joe Biden are invalid, claiming they were ... alleging they destroyed evidence and used the autopen for pardons without Biden's ...
US President Donald Trump on Monday declared all pardons issued by former President Joe Biden to be null and void, claiming they were executed without Biden’s knowledge or approval. Trump alleged that ...
President Trump declared all pardons granted by Joe Biden as invalid, alleging they were issued without Biden's knowledge using ... Therefore, those on the Unselect Committee, who destroyed and ...
In a post to Truth Social shared just after midnight, Mr. Trump claimed without evidence that Biden himself did not sign the pardons he issued to the members of the Jan. 6 select committee ...
President Donald Trump claimed without evidence early Monday that pardons ... committee that investigated the 2021 Capitol riot were invalid because he used an automatic pen.
President Donald Trump claimed that former President Joe Biden's pardons of lawmakers who served on the House Select Committee to investigate the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, and others, are "VOID ...
is invalid. Chief Judge Rodney Gilstrap said Samsung’s evidence, including its expert’s testimony explaining prior art references, was sufficient for finding the patent claim invalid.