Although both trials are small, they are a good start at gathering data on paid peer review, says Balazs Aczel, a psychologist at Eötvös Loránd University in Budapest. But he adds that whether to pay ...

The peer review process is central to science – but it can be easily manipulated. Improving it is vital to uphold research ...

Torbjørn Netland argues that peer review could potentially be improved by giving reviewers more choice. “Greetings! You’ve ...

Formal post-publication commentary on published papers can involve challenges, clarifications or, in some cases, replication of the published work and may, after peer review, be published online ...

Sakana said it collaborated with researchers at the University of British Columbia and the University of Oxford to submit three AI-generated papers to the aforementioned workshop for peer review.

His response came after Kerala Congress alleged that the BJP was pushing "fake" GDP figures. “BJP has started a new propaganda that we've reached a $4.3 trillion GDP,” the par ...

“The Sage publication that accepted my bogus paper is the Journal of International Medical Research. Without asking for any changes to the paper's scientific content, the journal sent an acceptance ...

Traditional forms of peer review occur before a paper is published. Both reviewers and authors remain anonymous. Different disciplines take a slightly different approach to the review process.

Japanese tech startup Sakana AI has written the first Artificial Intelligence (AI) generated peer-reviewed scientific paper, the company announced Wednesday.

Several AI academics took to social media to criticize Intology and Autoscience’s stunts as a co-opting of the scientific peer review process. “All these AI scientist papers are using peer ...

“We’re proud to announce that a paper produced by the AI Scientist-v2 passed the peer-review process at a workshop in ICLR (International Conference on Learning Representations), a top AI ...