Traditional forms of peer review occur before a paper is published. Both reviewers and authors remain anonymous. Different disciplines take a slightly different approach to the review process. In the ...

Sakana said it collaborated with researchers at the University of British Columbia and the University of Oxford to submit ...

Formal post-publication commentary on published papers can involve challenges, clarifications or, in some cases, replication of the published work and may, after peer review, be published online ...

After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should be sent for peer review.

On February 19, 2025, the California Court of Appeal published a decision, Lin v. Board of Directors of PrimeCare Medical ...

Peer review—the bedrock of scientific quality control—is under pressure. The standard approach for reviewer selection is to match signed-up referees with submitted papers using a keyword search, the ...

SMPTE, the global society of media professionals, technologists, and engineers working in the digital entertainment industry, ...

“The Sage publication that accepted my bogus paper is the Journal of International Medical Research. Without asking for any changes to the paper's scientific content, the journal sent an acceptance ...

It is expected that in 2025, approximately three million articles will be indexed in Scopus and the Web of Science. If each undergoes peer review by two experts, and an additional 2 million articles ...

Suggest potential reviewers Make a decision on the paper without further review (the manuscript will move to step ... the SME will evaluate the revised manuscript and either request further peer ...

The Editor-in-Chief must approve all accept and reject decisions, except when away or recused from peer review. Authors can expect to learn of a decision on their paper approximately 4 weeks after ...